Exploring the Keynesian–Ordoliberal Divide. Flexibility and Convergence in French and German Leaders' Economic Ideas During the Euro-Crisis
In: Journal of contemporary European studies, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 288-302
ISSN: 1478-2790
5 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of contemporary European studies, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 288-302
ISSN: 1478-2790
In: Journal of contemporary European studies, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 288-302
ISSN: 1478-2804
World Affairs Online
In: L' Europe en formation: revue d'études sur la construction européenne et le fédéralisme = journal of studies on European integration and federalism, Band 353 - 354, Heft 3, S. 133-148
ISSN: 2410-9231
Résumé Avec un recul de plusieurs décennies, la mise en place rapide et soudaine du Système monétaire européen, dans le contexte morose et eurosclérosé des années soixante-dix, demeure une réussite assez impressionnante. Cet article démontre que ce bond en avant inespéré dans le domaine économique et monétaire européen fut rendu possible par une rencontre des idées entre le chancelier Schmidt et le président Giscard d'Estaing. Cependant leur succès, dans une période d'eurosclérose et d'économie en berne, dépendait largement des contraintes et opportunités issues du contexte politique et économique européen.
Collaborative leadership has stood at the heart of European politics since its inception. Yet EU scholars have only recently started to examine the concept and mainly from an institutional perspective. This article conceptualises the phenomenon of collaborative leadership from an actor-centered perspective. It explores a central condition for successful collaborative leadership identified in the literature: the existence of shared beliefs among the leaders involved. To do this, the article focuses on four events in the history of European Economic and Monetary Union. Using the method of cognitive mapping, the study establishes the extent of congruence in the beliefs on European integration and fiscal and monetary policy of the four leadership trios overseeing these events. On the basis of a survey of leading experts in the field, the article reveals that the level of cognitive proximity in leaders' beliefs aligns with the perceived success with which the trios exerted collaborative leadership.
BASE
Cognitive complexity is a concept that allows scholars to distinguish unidimensional thinking from multidimensional thinking, which allows citizens to identify and integrate various perspectives of a topic. Especially in times of fake news, fact-free politics, and affective polarization, the news media would ideally foster such complex political understanding. The current paper introduces the method of cognitive mapping to measure cognitive complexity regarding citizens' understanding of the financial crisis, one of the most pressing political issues of the past decades. Linking content-analytic data to panel-survey data, we examine how exposure to news about the crisis relates to cognitive complexity. A wide variety of news sources (print, television, and online) were analyzed to take the high-choice media environment into account. Results show that news consumption generally is related to a less cognitively complex understanding of the financial crisis. However, actual exposure to news about the crisis (combined measurement of content analysis and survey data) is positively related to cognitive complexity, particularly among less-educated citizens. In addition, the most prominent topics in news coverage were more frequently associated with the financial crisis, as reflected in the cognitive maps of less-educated citizens exposed to more crisis news. These findings demonstrate the potential of news media to increase citizens' complexity of understanding, especially among the less educated.
BASE